Can GPS tell me what town I am in?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bijan
  • Start date Start date
B

Bijan

Now that I have the GPS V, how can I tell what town I am driving
through? Around here, you could be passing through 5 towns on your way
to work and not know where you are.
 
Bij:

If you use the Garmin find command...

and sort cities by nearest city....

You should see a list of current & near by cities...
 
Bijan said:
Now that I have the GPS V, how can I tell what town I am driving
through? Around here, you could be passing through 5 towns on your way
to work and not know where you are.
Click to expand...

On my eMap I pan the cursor over to a nearby street until an address is
displayed. Then hitting ENT gives the complete address including city/town
name (if within a city). Don't know if there's any more direct way of doing
it on the V.
 
Dennis said:
Bij:

If you use the Garmin find command...

and sort cities by nearest city....

You should see a list of current & near by cities...
Click to expand...

True, but in areas where the cities blend together I frequently find that
the one that's nearest is not the one I'm actually in. The 'nearest' list
is sorted based on distance to some nominal city center and I could be
closest to that center of one town while actually within the borders of
another.
 
[email protected] (Bijan) wrote in
Now that I have the GPS V, how can I tell what town I am driving
through? Around here, you could be passing through 5 towns on your way
to work and not know where you are.
Click to expand...

Think about te problem - without using the GPS at all,
how do YOU know what town you are in?

Presumably your answer would have something to do with
knowledge of your position relative to the town's boundaries.
Does the GPS V have data on town boundaries?
Or does it have each town, but only as a single position?

--
Dave Patton
Canadian Coordinator, the Degree Confluence Project
http://www.confluence.org dpatton at confluence dot org
My website: http://members.shaw.ca/davepatton/
Vancouver/Whistler - host of the 2010 Winter Olympics
 
GPS knows its own lat/long. It also has a map. Put the two toegther
and it should know the town. It seems to me that the information is
there. The functionality must be implemented.
 
Bijan said:
GPS knows its own lat/long. It also has a map. Put the two toegther
and it should know the town. It seems to me that the information is
there. The functionality must be implemented.
Click to expand...

Did you try the work-around I use on the eMap; i.e. moving the cursor
slightly so it highlights a nearby street address and then clicking ENT to
bring up the complete address, including the city? I've used this a fair
number of times on group bike rides when someone is curious through which
town we're currently riding since many towns in the SF Bay area blend together.
 
[email protected] (Bijan) wrote in
GPS knows its own lat/long. It also has a map. Put the two toegther
and it should know the town. It seems to me that the information is
there. The functionality must be implemented.
Click to expand...

[top posting fixed]

Yes, the GPS knows it's(your) position.
Yes, in this scenario, the GPS knows the "position" of the town
(e.g. maybe it's the city hall, post office, etc.).
Yes, the GPS has a map, comprised of vector data, that 'describes'
various features, such as roads.
No, that's not sufficient to tell you what town you are in.

Again - think about how YOU would know what town you are in,
without using the GPS. You would either have to know where the
town boundary lies, and your relationship to it, or, for some
cases, it may be sufficient to know what street you are on, if
the street is completely contained within the town.

For a GPS to do the same sort of thing, it would need boundary data
for every town, and the functionality in the firmware to calculate
whether the current GPS position is within the polygon described
by the boundary. Town boundaries aren't regular, thus the data
is required. What could be implemented would be a 'proximity
alarm' to tell you when you are within a certain distance of the
"town's location", but that's not going to tell you whether or not
you are actually within a town, at least not reliably.

For the 'street solution', the existing vector street data would
have to have 'proximity data' included, to enable the GPS to
calculate if the current GPS position is "on" the street
(which it may already be able to do), and a database to be able
to correlate streets with towns, and, without additional data, that
would only work for streets that are completely within the town.

--
Dave Patton
Canadian Coordinator, the Degree Confluence Project
http://www.confluence.org dpatton at confluence dot org
My website: http://members.shaw.ca/davepatton/
Vancouver/Whistler - host of the 2010 Winter Olympics
 
You will not like this answer, but if you feed your GPS output into
Delorme's Street Atlas [ say on a laptop ] you can see what town you are in.
One of the settings shows all township boundaries and further if you just
drag the mouse around it will display what road you are on by name or route
number, town, state and zip. Most of the data seems pretty accurate.


Dave Patton said:
[email protected] (Bijan) wrote in
GPS knows its own lat/long. It also has a map. Put the two toegther
and it should know the town. It seems to me that the information is
there. The functionality must be implemented.
Click to expand...

[top posting fixed]

Yes, the GPS knows it's(your) position.
Yes, in this scenario, the GPS knows the "position" of the town
(e.g. maybe it's the city hall, post office, etc.).
Yes, the GPS has a map, comprised of vector data, that 'describes'
various features, such as roads.
No, that's not sufficient to tell you what town you are in.

Again - think about how YOU would know what town you are in,
without using the GPS. You would either have to know where the
town boundary lies, and your relationship to it, or, for some
cases, it may be sufficient to know what street you are on, if
the street is completely contained within the town.

For a GPS to do the same sort of thing, it would need boundary data
for every town, and the functionality in the firmware to calculate
whether the current GPS position is within the polygon described
by the boundary. Town boundaries aren't regular, thus the data
is required. What could be implemented would be a 'proximity
alarm' to tell you when you are within a certain distance of the
"town's location", but that's not going to tell you whether or not
you are actually within a town, at least not reliably.

For the 'street solution', the existing vector street data would
have to have 'proximity data' included, to enable the GPS to
calculate if the current GPS position is "on" the street
(which it may already be able to do), and a database to be able
to correlate streets with towns, and, without additional data, that
would only work for streets that are completely within the town.

--
Dave Patton
Canadian Coordinator, the Degree Confluence Project
http://www.confluence.org dpatton at confluence dot org
My website: http://members.shaw.ca/davepatton/
Vancouver/Whistler - host of the 2010 Winter Olympics
Click to expand...
 

Members online

Total: 53 (members: 2, guests: 51)
Back
Top