Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will

I will be looking forward to seeing "Phineas T Puddleduck"
comment of some of the "clues" that he asserts that I am resistant to.

So far, all I have seen from Puddleduck is parroting,
and attacks on the messenger.

Ever notice than when some immature, clueless clown comes into sci.physics
and gets exposed, he climbs into bed with Sam Wormley and Dork Moortel?

Parrots of the feather, horse's asses, and all that.

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

 

You love parrots don't you.

--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

 

Don't flatter yourself. Your idiocy isn't worth it. And please expose
my ignorance. For a start, please tell me the 13 GR hacks to GPS. Name
them, and list mathematically what they entail.

Once you've done that, then perhaps I'll argue with you... Cause right
now, all you are doing is parroting the same parrot old parrot nonsense
sqwawk that doesn't wanna a cracker make sense.

--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

 

What gets my goat Sam,
is cult-like worship of science models and science figures.

I have no objection to folks worshiping cult leaders
like David Koresh and James Jones,
and cult religions like Judaism and Hinduism,
but I think this kind of cult behavior
is not conducive to good science.

For example, note that Sam gives credit to Einstein and GTR
for the GPS system, when the fact of the matter is that it
had nothing to do with the success of the system.

They sent up satellites with precision oscillators on board,
noted how much the oscillators changed in frequency,
found the change in frequency matched Galileo's
200 year old equation,
and then they adjusted the frequency dividers accordingly.

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

 

LOVE the website btw. A nice little reminder to keep on my toes to make
sure I don't end up in there ;-)


--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

"General Relativity is a Tower of Babel that wastes time, money and minds on
such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves.."
Tom saves us from ourselves and badly written scifi.

 

You don't even need Newton's Laws to model
the frequency offset in the GPS oscillators.

All you need is Galileo's 200 year old equation.

There will never be progress in physics
as long as people continue to make hacks to GTR.

New York Times:
"All the News that's print to fit."
(The Times management agenda.)

GTR:
"The model that is hacked to fit."
(The Einstein cult agenda.)

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

 

And if you'd actually read the link I provided.. you'd know the
corrections are continual due to the fact the clocks are at different
rates. But then you're in denial. Sqwawk

--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

"General Relativity is a Tower of Babel that wastes time, money and minds on
such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves.."
Tom saves us from ourselves and badly written scifi.

 

I've nearly finished my Masters in it.

Cool resume Erik.

I get yours. Pretty basic misunderstanding of physics I'd expect from a
high school student.

Quite possibly...

You really have a parrot fetish don't you. Norwegian Blue?


--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

"General Relativity is a Tower of Babel that wastes time, money and minds on
such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves.."
Tom saves us from ourselves and badly written scifi.

 

Sorry I confused you Sam
by using "bit rate" rather than "chip rate".

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

 

It is interesting to see that "Phineas T Puddleduck"
shucks and jives when asked to prove that he
comprehends and can use a physics model that he hypes.

It is also interesting to see that after shucking and jiving,
he reveals his inner self with his statement:
"Projection is when you endlessly accuse others of what you do."

In other words, Phineas T Puddleduck has no idea how to use GTR to
do anything useful, so he "projects" his inabilty
to solve a real world problem onto me.

You have to admit one thing though,
"Phineas T Puddleduck" sure knows how to shucke and jive,
and parrot.

Polly want a cracker?

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

 

When it comes right down to it, Potter, respects my posts,
but won't admit it!

 

No - just indicative of your ongoing cunfusion.


--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

"General Relativity is a Tower of Babel that wastes time, money and minds on
such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves.."
Tom saves us from ourselves and badly written scifi.

 

That gets my goat too, Potter. You should be more skeptical
like a scientist--research the empirical data supporting
modern physics. Watch out, Potter, you might learn something
new!

 

The hacks such as Perihelion precession which accurately describe
orbital motion you mean. But I suppose I must remember that any
sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

In your case, even a stick must seem amazing.


--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

"General Relativity is a Tower of Babel that wastes time, money and minds on
such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves.."
Tom saves us from ourselves and badly written scifi.

 

For the last year I did an reasonably indepth analysis of the Newtonian
and GR orbital motions. I could provide you with a pdf if you'd like,
its got a lot of info on how the standard conic sections predicted by
Newtonian gravity yields a plethora of open forms in GR.

Like the idea of dwell time, and how perihelia precession in the solar
system is a consequence of modelling its motion as a simple harmonic
oscillator and examining the difference between radial periodic motion
and the periodic motion of the perihelia.

I also investigated analytically this procedure, as well as coding it.

Now to any GR expert its pretty beginning stuff. But the point is -
I've done it, and its patently obvious k00k you haven't even tried to
do the math around GR

There you go - prove me wrong. Do the GPS project on eftaylor.com, and
publish your results.

Psychosis?

--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.

"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

"General Relativity is a Tower of Babel that wastes time, money and minds on
such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves.."
Tom saves us from ourselves and badly written scifi.

 

What are these 13 hacks that you refer to Potter?

 

Either way you've got it wrong Potter... your numbers are just
plain wrong whether talking about chip rates or bit rates. As
I said, Potter, you don't have a clue about the basic operation
of GPS as is demonstrated in these newsgroups!

 

If I take 6 months and become an expert in Differential
Geometry so I can take apart all the various GR proofs,
will that work get published? Who will understand my proofs?
Those who do, will make nonsensical dishonest claims that my
proofs are not valid. Nobody else will understand what
or why, so they will have to take the word of the
acknowledged experts.

You don't believe that?

Well, I think my explanation of light transmission in vacuum is
something nobody came up with before -- do you see people
citing my website all over the place? Where is the discussion
of the implications of that? My explanation of the electron
gun causing anomalous behavior is something nobody came
up with before -- where are the implications discussed?

Or does all of that get disproved by some satellite data
that matched some convoluted mathematical hackery?

The treatment of vacuum-light-transmission and
electron-gun and proposed-MMX-explanation proves
to me beyond a shadow of doubt that the establishment
is not where it should be. So what would be the point
in trying to give it more complex work that nobody impartial
can understand, when even the work that most people can
easily understand doesn't raise an honest stir?

 

Yes I don't belief that. Free hint, you are not the cleverest person in the
world, and SOMEONE somewhere will understand it. When people rip your work
apart, its not cause they don't understand it - its cause its wrong 90% of the
time. If you had faith in your own work you wouldn't cry foul - you'd pick
yourself up and make it better.

I do not believe your paranoid rantings about an anti GR or even anti
Established Science position. Arxiv.org is full of papers on MOND and the like.

Have you even *tried* to publish stuff or are you just happy to imagine
muttered words in dark corrridors?

Where have you tried to publicise them too? Hint: USENET isn't the place.

OH not you and GPS and GR - if you disblelief GR and GPS I have no truck with
you whatsoever,

You're sounding more like a paranoid person then anything

--

The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

"Time is pseudo-directional because randomness is always pseudo-random..."
Jeff revolutionises physics in sci.physics.
"Now there's two stuck naysay lose cannons and a third sick puppy on the way."
Brad tries to reason with the voices in his head...

 

Stop flattering yourself, Mukesh Prasad, you will not get differential
geometry in 6 centuries, let alone 6 months.

Even if you "got' differential geometry" what arrogance to believe that
you can "take apart...". All you can take apart is your own shit that
you eat daily.

No one, since they are cretinoid.

Don't flatter yourself, Mukesh Prasad, you cannot write a line of math
if your life depended on it.

Of course not, cretinoid. Because it is a piece of shit coming out of a
demented mind. The mind of Mukesh Prasad.

Where is the discussion

Nowhere. Because the "explanation" is brain damaged. Perhaps if you
stopped eating your own shit you might return to normal, Mukesh Prasad.

You mean GPS, you arrogant cretin?

Well, it is you who are not where you should be: the lunatic asylum.

Right, so get the **** off this website, there are legitimate websites
for antirelativistic kooks. You will get a sympathetic ear ther. Now,
scram!